Choosing a provider? Ask one question.
The test
Does your per-message price change when your software plan changes? Meta charges one rate for a marketing message to an Indian number and offers no discount for being on somebody's top plan. So if a provider quotes three message prices against three subscription tiers, that spread is not Meta's price moving. It is theirs.
That is arithmetic rather than an accusation, and it is on everybody's public pricing page including ours. It is also not a reason on its own to choose one over another — a provider that resells messages is carrying credit and giving you one rupee invoice, which some businesses want. But it decides whether you can ever see what a WhatsApp message actually costs you.
Side by side
The structural differences.
Not features — those change every quarter. These follow from how each company is set up with Meta, and they are the ones still true next year.
-
talkv
- Who bills you for messages
- Meta, directly to your card
- Message price vs software plan
- No plans. Meta’s rate is Meta’s rate
- Monthly platform fee
- None
- Charged per team member
- None — add your whole team
-
Wati
- Who bills you for messages
- Wati, from credits you buy
- Message price vs software plan
- Rate card is Wati’s, not Meta’s
- Monthly platform fee
- Yes on team plans; single-user is pay-as-you-go
- Charged per team member
- Yes — extra users charged monthly
-
AiSensy
- Who bills you for messages
- AiSensy, as prepaid message credits
- Message price vs software plan
- Same published rate across plans
- Monthly platform fee
- Free plan; paid add-ons are monthly
- Charged per team member
- No — up to 200 agents under fair use
-
Interakt
- Who bills you for messages
- Interakt, on its own rate card
- Message price vs software plan
- Yes — cheaper messages on higher plans
- Monthly platform fee
- Free Starter plan; paid plans monthly
- Charged per team member
- No on main plans; the CRM add-on is per agent
-
Gallabox
- Who bills you for messages
- Gallabox, Meta’s fee plus its markup
- Message price vs software plan
- Same markup on paid plans; lower on Enterprise
- Monthly platform fee
- Yes — from ₹2,399 a month billed yearly
- Charged per team member
- Yes — ₹1,200–₹1,500 per extra user a month
-
DoubleTick
- Who bills you for messages
- Not stated; charges follow Meta’s rates
- Message price vs software plan
- No per-message rates on its plans
- Monthly platform fee
- Yes — from ₹3,000 a month billed yearly
- Charged per team member
- 5 or 10 agents included; more on Enterprise
-
Gupshup
- Who bills you for messages
- Gupshup, in dollars, Meta’s fee plus its own
- Message price vs software plan
- Self-serve is flat; enterprise is negotiated
- Monthly platform fee
- None on self-serve
- Charged per team member
- Not on the self-serve price list
Read from each provider's own public pricing page on 6 October 2026. Pricing changes — if theirs disagrees with this, theirs is right. Tell us and we will correct it.
One at a time
Individual comparisons
-
talkv or Wati
One of the largest WhatsApp business tools, sold worldwide and priced in dollars.
Including when Wati is the better choice, which we say on the page.
Compare -
talkv or AiSensy
An Indian platform, priced in rupees, aimed squarely at Indian small and mid-sized businesses.
Including when AiSensy is the better choice, which we say on the page.
Compare -
talkv or Interakt
An Indian platform with a strong ecommerce focus, particularly Shopify and WooCommerce catalogues.
Including when Interakt is the better choice, which we say on the page.
Compare -
talkv or Gallabox
An Indian platform built around AI agents and sales pipelines, across WhatsApp, Instagram and web chat.
Including when Gallabox is the better choice, which we say on the page.
Compare -
talkv or DoubleTick
An Indian WhatsApp CRM for sales teams, with a mobile app for the team and AI agents on its higher plan.
Including when DoubleTick is the better choice, which we say on the page.
Compare -
talkv or Gupshup
One of the largest messaging platforms in the world, sold to developers self-serve and to enterprises by contract.
Including when Gupshup is the better choice, which we say on the page.
Compare
Where we lose
Four reasons to buy one of the others.
A comparison page that lists no drawbacks is an advertisement, and readers price it accordingly. These are ours, and each of them is a real reason somebody should choose a competitor instead.
- We are younger and smaller than every provider compared here, and that shows in how much product you get.
- No visual chatbot builder. There are keyword rules, greetings and away messages, and that is the whole of it.
- No app-store catalogue of integrations — there is a developer API, but you build the connection.
- No SOC 2, because we have not been audited. If you need one to buy, we are not the right answer yet.
Questions
Asked while shortlisting.
Which WhatsApp Business provider is cheapest in India?
There is no single answer, because providers price differently rather than at different levels. A provider charging a monthly subscription is cheaper for a business that sends heavily every month and more expensive for one that broadcasts a few times a year. The larger question is whether the provider bills you for the WhatsApp messages on its own rate card or lets Meta bill you directly, because that decides whether you can see what the messages actually cost.
How do I tell whether a WhatsApp provider is marking up my messages?
Look at whether the per-message price changes with the software plan. Meta charges one rate for a marketing message to a given country and does not discount it for being on a higher subscription tier. A provider publishing different per-message prices against different plans is showing you its own margin. The other test is simply whether a Meta invoice exists in your own name in Meta Business Suite.
What is the difference between a WhatsApp Tech Provider and a BSP?
A Tech Provider connects software to a business’s own WhatsApp Business Account, and Meta bills that business directly for messages. A Solution Partner, commonly called a BSP, holds a credit line with Meta, buys messages and resells them on its own rate card. Both are legitimate Meta partnerships. The practical difference is who sends you the invoice for the messages, and therefore whose number the message price is.
Next
Or skip the reading and price your own send.
Put in a list size and see Meta's half and the software's half separately, which is the comparison that actually decides it.
